Our approved summary
The ads implied unlimited free airport lounge passes but did not clearly say there was a limit, so consumers might not get passes as expected (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 8.17).
Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The ads implied unlimited free airport lounge passes but did not clearly say there was a limit, so consumers might not get passes as expected (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 8.17).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The ad claimed a price advantage and offered glasses for £6 but did not provide verifiable evidence or accurate price comparisons, misleading consumers about the true cost and value (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.17).
- The claim that the wine was the same as top chateaus was misleading as no proof showed it matched their quality or blend (CAP 3.1, 3.7).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.