Skip to content

Our approved summary

The ads claimed a 21% saving with crossed-out prices but there was no proof the saving was real against usual prices so the claim was misleading (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.17).

Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .

The ads claimed a 21% saving with crossed-out prices but there was no proof the saving was real against usual prices so the claim was misleading (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.17).

What to do next

Browse the Get help guides

More ASA rulings explained

Official ruling

Read the official ASA ruling.

The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.