Our approved summary
The ad claimed savings for consumers installing at least eight solar panels but left out key information and lacked proof for the savings claim (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The ad claimed savings for consumers installing at least eight solar panels but left out key information and lacked proof for the savings claim (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The claim that the supplements' nutrients came from food or natural sources was not supported because some ingredients were made using chemical synthesis (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
- The claim that customers could save up to £546 was misleading because it left out important details and lacked sufficient evidence to support the savings stated (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.