Our approved summary
The claim that customers could save up to £546 was misleading because it left out important details and lacked sufficient evidence to support the savings stated (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The claim that customers could save up to £546 was misleading because it left out important details and lacked sufficient evidence to support the savings stated (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The ad claimed savings for consumers installing at least eight solar panels but left out key information and lacked proof for the savings claim (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
- The ads said the device treated anxiety and insomnia with no evidence it worked or was a registered medical device, and the testimonials did not look genuine (CAP 3.7, 3.47, 12.1).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.