Our approved summary
The ads implied typical results and profits from free training alone which were not supported by evidence and likely untrue, making the claims misleading and unsubstantiated (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.11).
Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The ads implied typical results and profits from free training alone which were not supported by evidence and likely untrue, making the claims misleading and unsubstantiated (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.11).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The ad suggested that the earnings shown were typical, but there was no evidence most people achieved those results, so the claim was misleading (CAP 3.1, 3.11).
- The ad suggested that the lifestyle and earnings shown were typical, but there was no evidence to support this so it was misleading to viewers (CAP 3.1, 3.11).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.