Our approved summary
The ad suggested that the lifestyle and earnings shown were typical, but there was no evidence to support this so it was misleading to viewers (CAP 3.1, 3.11).
Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The ad suggested that the lifestyle and earnings shown were typical, but there was no evidence to support this so it was misleading to viewers (CAP 3.1, 3.11).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The ads implied typical results and profits from free training alone which were not supported by evidence and likely untrue, making the claims misleading and unsubstantiated (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.11).
- The ads suggested typical results that were unlikely and claimed a free course was only available for 48 hours though it lasted longer, misleading about effectiveness and timing (CAP 3.1, 3.11, 3.30).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.