Our approved summary
The claim of high pass rates was misleading because there was no evidence showing what tests or time period it covered or how results compared to a benchmark (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
Upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The claim of high pass rates was misleading because there was no evidence showing what tests or time period it covered or how results compared to a benchmark (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.7).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The claim that the watch was the last available worldwide was misleading as there was no proof it was unavailable from other sellers (BCAP 3.32, 3.33).
- The claim said the product could be installed easily without a qualified electrician but UK rules require a certified installer, so the claim was misleading for not making that clear (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 3.9).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.