Our approved summary
The ad claimed rooms were available at the advertised price in Piccadilly, and there was enough availability to support this, so the price claim was not misleading (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.17).
Not upheld by the ASA. Ruling published by the ASA on .
The ad claimed rooms were available at the advertised price in Piccadilly, and there was enough availability to support this, so the price claim was not misleading (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.17).
What to do next
More ASA rulings explained
- The ad claimed a price saving by comparing packages that were not identical and included different baggage allowances, making the comparison misleading and unverifiable (CAP 3.1, 3.32, 3.34).
- The claim that large cabin bags were available from £5.99 was misleading because there was no sufficient proof this price applied across many flights and dates (CAP 3.1, 3.7, 3.17).
Official ruling
The official ruling is the definitive version. Mystery Slopper is not affiliated with the ASA.